An Element of Art and Science Essay Example for Free

An fraction of Art and Science Essaystar divination provides a very debatable anatomy of knowledge that is principally assessed by the intelligent as a useless kind of knowledge, which only makes sense for the ignorant. At the kindred time astrology is usually associated with gypsies and hucksters, who are known for their deceptive and fake knowledge, as they try to wander people for their own financial interest. On the different hand, we find people with high education attempting to weigh astrology and very much respect the kind of knowledge it offers them. Whether much(prenominal) knowledge offered th shingly statement astrology in universities is worth doing or to be considered an inapplicable knowledge for high education is a critical decision to make, which requires obtaining a great insight about astrology it self as an academician field in order to be able to make a correct assessment. astrology is really a combined form of knowledge that both combine both the element of art and of attainment in its essence.It contains the mathematical element as well as the artistic element o symbolisation (Astrology? 891). Scientists usually disregard the art side of astrology and focus on the basic mathematical map of it, as they judge it as useless and insignifi terminatet. This actually destroys the wholeness and counterweight at bottom the realm itself. This whitethorn be considered a reason for mis apprehension the real value of knowledge in astrology.It is in addition a fact that every field is vulnerable to be used by ignorant people who indigent it totally of its meaning and value, in order to sell it as cheap as possible in a market of ignorance that unfortunately have many customers who are wiling to buy, again this helps in misunderstanding Astrology (Astrology? 891) and as there is the presence of the competent and the incompetent in every field, and people usually try for the best in every profession, so why exclude Astrology (Astr ology? 896).Astrology requires a train kind of thinking as it combines artistic and scientific knowledge, it suffer therefore never be considered as in earthshaking knowledge. It may not be appreciated by scientists due to the artistic element provided within it, and their total dependence on reason for discovering reality since the onset of the renaissance thus reviving such forms of knowledge actually, shows the evolution of knowledge and thinking that reflects the signifi grassce of transcendent forms of knowledge besides the pure sane ones.The astrological systemal knowledge in itself consists of a natural balance among intuitive and rational knowledge, and pitiful this balance will only lead to the production of inconsistent forms of knowledge that seem to appear on the surface to help in the generation of misunderstandings regarding astrology. The argument of scientists against Astrology reflects the on going disagreement between scientific knowledge and intuitive forms of knowledge. Scientists never necessitate the truth in any intuitive understanding, and they usually regarded as invalid.They never accept the fact the mystery is part of reality and that the rational mind can never be able to reach full understanding of the universe. Astrology is a balanced kind of knowledge as it respects both forms of thinking, which in fact a respect for nature and for the valet de chambre being as part of that nature. I feel that the purpose of a reading is to understand ones life challenges And potential, to provide an opportunity for self reflection and life Evaluation, as well as to confirm ones intuitive sense of what ones Life is about (Astrology? 895).Human beings as well as nature are make of matter and individual that can never be detached from each other as coherent as life is there. How can scientists reach the truth if they are actually altering the natural balance in life by looking for material proof and ignoring the intuitive reality of na ture? The soul remains a mystery that can never be explained by scientific truth, and science can not resolve the question of life and death. There fore, accepting astrology as a significant form of knowledge by a scientist is truly a question of him admitting intuition as a part of reality.From other side, if the depicted object had not been on intuition, regarding astrology, it is still a form of knowledge that sure as shooting provides the individual with some insight about life and introduces him to different kinds of thinking it should be even impute for this reason alone, my studies in Astrology, as well as in other fields, are attempts to understand the stately design of the whole (Astrology? 894). Scientists also accuse Astrological interpretive knowledge of not being aim stars incline but do not compel (A critical? 882), and this fact works against scientific logic which is sharp and determinant. But actually, life in it self is never exact or straight earlier and c lear as mathematical knowledge entails for instance. Astrology may actually provide the best for of understanding of life and nature it allows people to understand reality the way it is without trying to alter its nature. The whole issue of prediction and future related knowledge can never be definite or in full explainable, to discuss future probabilities is much like giving a weather report (Astrology? 896).On the other hand, it should be admitted that Astrological knowledge may help in creating dependent and weak individuals, if they used it slanderly. It efficiency lead them to spin in a cycle, which they might not be able to break. People can stress too much on the intuitive knowledge in Astrology and thus at one time again altering its balance of logic and intuition and thus getting again a wrong insight about life and nature, with an accompanied change in personality and attitude to life Astrology, when unspoilt as completely as possible, takes away from ach of us our r ight and duty to make our own personal decisions (A Critical? 882). In the case of a scientist who puts great emphasis on logic and excludes intuition, makes him a rough and rigid person who stands weak in front of the scientifically unexplained mysteries of the world while in the case of the ignorant who does the opposite to give too much significance to intuition and disregards reason suffers another kind of weakness that creates a dependent and shattered personality.But again we must also admit that this would be the case with any field if wrongly interpreted. All in all, I believe that Astrology is a sophisticated form of knowledge that should be respected for the special thinking abilities it provides an individual who studies it. It also reflects on the importance of providing a balance between Art and Science, and thus between logic and intuition, which is plunge deep within the nature of man and the universe he lives in.I would very strongly urge on all institutions of hig h education to teach Astrology in order to correct the misunderstanding empower to it, and thus expose the rich and deep knowledge it provides. Works Cited Bok, Bart J. A Critical watch at Astrology. The Humanist Costello, Priscilla. Astrology, Science or Abracadabra? Wellesley College.