Police Discretion in Domestic Violence Research Paper

Police adroitness in Domestic Violence - Research Paper ExampleMost police ships officers feel that a interior(prenominal) dispute is a private matter that should be handled by both parties. However, police officers mostly believe on their experience as police officers to handle the situation as they think appropriate. Police daintiness in Domestic Violence Introduction Family problems which breed domestic force out are universal issues which yarn-dye all members of the family including parents and children. Domestic violence faeces be fatal, but it can be effectively controlled with the graceful implementation of law and timely and appropriate intervention by the police. Police reactions to incidents of domestic violence wee usually depended upon the attitude and appreciation of the officer involved in investigating the reported incident. Discretion can be characterized as the authority of the police officer to chose his/her course of action or inaction. Police maintain discretionary powers in their positions as protectors of the public and upholders of the law. A lot has been written about police discretion in the criminal justice field procedures. It has been proved that arrests in such matters reduce incidences, as the offender might non repeat the offence for fear of prosecution. Many ab subprogramd women do not blazon out the police because they feel that they will not be taken seriously, and the police might make use of its discretionary powers and not arrest the abuser. In such cases, it leads to further violence causing abundanter blot or harm to the spouse, partner or children. Sometimes women do not report domestic violence because they do not want their spouse or partner to be arrested and sent to prison (Green & Kelso, 2010). Discussed below are some of pros and cons of the police discretion in domestic violence. Police discretion was an unmentionable theme right up to 1956, when it was brought to light by an American Bar Foundati on Study. Until then, no one would bring that it was a reality. The approach of police high-ups was that any digression from accepted or written down procedures was not permissible by law, and most probably a basis for dishonesty. When it became public knowledge, the police administration do efforts to play it down or even have it outlawed. The actual problem lies in the abuse of discretion, not in its implementation. Police discretion is now accepted as an indispensable malevolence, which can be of great use if used properly. Community policing is where officers can exercise discretion to help the community more effectively. Discretion is good when it is managed and well thought-out. (Green & Kelso, 2010) Defining Police Discretion Some facts which can be regarded as both pros and cons depending upon application have described police discretion as an area where the law is not enforced or as the gap in the doughnut. Discretion is the vacant space which is surrounded by the releva nt set of principles and procedures. Alternatively, it can be described as cases where no rules are applicable and the officer makes a personal decision based on beliefs, assumptions and his own interpretation of the situation. Discretion is not the same(p) as repetitive and consistent compliance. It entails information, talent and the ability to act and perform in random and unwieldy situations. Police are not soldiers who must obey orders blindly and without question. Police must be kinda